STUFF AND STYLE OF THE UNIVERSE

Chapters 4 and 5


Continued from Chapter 3 of Stuff and Style of the Universe


Back to Chapters 1, 2 and 3

To the concluding chapters (Chapters 6,7 and 8)

 

 



4

The Packages Fair

 


A unique feature of the universe is that everything is exchanged only in discrete packages. No loose sample is allowed. Also, all transactions are carried out in a move-stop-and-move-again style of action. ‘Givers’ move in jerks, ‘takers’ follow suit. It may seem rather odd but presumably it has been this way always.

Why everything behaves in ‘fits and starts’ and not in a smooth and continuous way has remained a mystery ever after the inception of quantum theory according to which no giver supplies anything in a steady stream. In the world of energy transactions, nothing flows evenly. It is all in packets. Discrete and finite are the packets. So much reluctance from a simple candle to give a little light.

Acceptance of what is given also runs into trouble unless the packaging is right. The wrong package is not taken. This mode of dealing is the only one that exists, so packaging has come to be accepted as an ‘inevitable ritual’. As this business of packing and unpacking is inexplicable and therefore apparently pointless, it has remained a thorn in the throat of physics.

To fathom the mystery, we have to observe more closely the ‘difficulties’ the ‘givers’ and the ‘takers’ face. First of all, who in fact are the givers? The ‘rich’, naturally; only those who have in excess can and are made to give. But this giver-status is comparative. A non-rich source who is in no position to give anything may suddenly find itself qualified and called upon to subscribe. That happens if and when the ‘world’ around gets depleted due to whatsoever reason and the non-rich happens to be holding in excess by ‘comparison’.

In a universe of various kinds of pulses of S and S itself pervading everything, pulses alone can be the givers. No transplanting or shipment of any ‘portion’ of toughness-difference from one part of S to another is possible unless it is discretely packed in the form of a pulse. Any other mode will involve intervention by an ‘external’ agency. There is none at hand.

What is being ‘given’? What does the pulse have in excess? Well, what does any pulse have at all? Pulses are composed of quanta of differences in toughness of S. A portion of this is the only thing it can spare.

But any pulse is a restless thing. Whatever it does is achieved while its pulsing goes on relentlessly. Donation or riddance of a bit of extra toughness by it or, to put it differently, the extraction of some toughness from it can happen only during appropriate ‘breathing spaces’ in this act. Exchanges are strictly constrained by the ‘pre-occupation’ of the giver. The outcome looks something like this: Give out a little now, a little more during the same opportunity that the next round of pulsing provides and so on. A ‘steady’ outflow or any once-for-all dumping is naturally ruled out.

Of course, if a pulse comes to a ‘sorry end’, all it has is given up at one stroke. This is when it ‘splits’ or gets ‘dismantled’. Even when the whole ‘wealth’ of a pulse is thus squandered at one go, this ‘wealth’ does not get lost in smithereens. Every bit of it is taken care of and packaged by the S around, fitting into resonance slots of host S, as is where is. The contents of these packets together will equal the content of the ‘demised’ pulse.

This means if by any chance the giver falls short of ‘fulfilling’ the packaging responsibility, the taker is ready to ‘backup’. The taker is no other than S. S is in no ‘mood’ to ‘swallow’ all-and-sundry ‘amounts’ of changes to its toughness inflicted on it as-is-where-is. The dictum enforced by its vigour is: Only so much of a certain thing at a time. Of course the acceptable ‘dose’ varies with the ‘kind’ of input. How much of what kind at each instance is decided by the readiness of S to react, its vigour.

As far as packaging goes, assurance is thus doubly assured. Whether the amount of ‘wealth’ dumped is as huge as a pre-big-bang monstrosity or as little as what a neutrino has, the assurance holds. But for this ‘obsession’ with discrete packaging, we would not have inherited the thoroughly ‘apportioned’ universe that we have.

Imagine an ‘injection’ of extra toughness into tough S. The attempt is naturally ‘resisted’. If the giver insists ‘vehemently’ enough, yes, the injection is tolerated but the dose injected is ‘quarantined’ within a shell of extra toughness in S developing in reaction to the spread of the dose injected and ‘swept up’ by the very same spread.

Observation of the drama of a package-transaction of this kind in detail (Fig. 10-14) is certain to yield dividends. It takes place in tough S. Whatever the T-and-D of the emission that takes place, every bit emitted adds to the toughness of S around the emitter. If D is small and/or T not very high, the injected dose meets with less ‘resistance’. Larger the D and higher the T of injection, S reacts in a matching fashion. The way S deals with the dose of injection into it depends solely upon the vigour of S.

As the emitter is a point on a pulse and that pulse is busy with its act of pulsing, the emitter cannot emit continuously. This holds whether the pulse emitting happens to be in good, bad or indifferent resonance with the surrounding S. Even otherwise, as the injected quantum keeps growing, the thickening shell of S around it builds up with it and, at some stage, ‘matures’ to match emitter pressure. In effect, any emission always amounts to an adjustment-game between the giver and the taker.

What if emitter pressure is checkmated and the injection stops? S now has a quantum of dynamic extra-toughness to contend with. If that quantum is sufficient to form a pulse in resonance with S, well and good, the quantum assumes that role. (Fig 11).

From the moment the emitter opens up to the instant when emitter pressure is checkmated, the extra toughness injected into S celebrates its expansion cycle. The injection is a dynamic event. As soon as the emission stops, the ‘dose’ injected goes into reverse cycle, forced by the reaction of S. The emitter cannot open up when this cycle piles up toughness at the centre of pulsing, namely, the point of emission itself, and seals it.

However, when the pulse enters its very next expansion cycle the shell of resistance around it developing in S ‘pushes away’ the developing outer shell of the emission. The newborn pulse is thus ‘released’ from the mother to mind its own business and live in S as long and as happily as its resonance capability allows it.

Pulses seem to be ‘conscious’ of their health and wellbeing in more ways than one. In fact they spare a portion of what they ‘have’ with a view of ‘gaining’ better chances of survival under the ‘special’ circumstances and not out of any ‘benevolence’. Better equilibrium, harmony and longer life are the benefits they get by doing this. A pulse can get rid of as little as it pleases. There is no lower limit to the amount they may deliver. It is up to S, the taker, to do whatever it ‘pleases’ with it. The package delivered is free to fall into whichever slot it fits into in S. There are several ‘harmonics’ to every slot too.

If the quantum delivered is tough and large enough, it succeeds in building its own fort and becomes an independent pulse. For this to happen, it should be capable of fitting itself into an appropriate slot in S to resonate. This is the cardinal pre-condition for its survival as an independent pulse. (Fig. 12, Fig. 13)

The fate of the unfortunate small quantum of ‘lean’ content ejected is a different story. To trace it in some detail, one will have to go back to the process of emission described earlier. The emitter now releases a very small quantum of lean content. The emission invites increasing resistance to it from S and that ‘prematurely’ checkmates emitter pressure. Also, the emitter, on its own, may close shop too soon. In either case the quantum remains too small and the nature of its ‘content’ too lean to develop into an independent pulse in S.

All the same, ‘action’ having been initiated by the emitter, an equal but opposite ‘reaction’ to that has developed in S. This pattern of action-reaction becomes a ‘half-formed’ pulse. It has no outer shell as the pulse has not been able to complete its expansion cycle. Its core too is ‘half-formed’ as its reverse cycle does not get completed. Moreover, this ‘premature’ core happens to be almost at the mouth of the emitter when the emitter reopens next time with another round of emission. The thrust of this emission ‘ejects’ the first-born from the emitter. The ‘ejection’ does two things to the ‘unwanted’ child. 1) It is sent away from the emitter. 2) It is given a ‘parting kick’ strong enough to confer on it a consolation prize – a mode of rectification pulsing. (Fig. 14)

This saves the ‘premature’ offspring from infantile mortality. ‘Kick-started’, rectification pulsing gives it a fresh lease of life, its only life.

As the emitter goes on, a continuous stream of such ‘half-formed’ or ‘also-ran’ pulse-lets is generated.

The ‘also-ran’ pulse-let does not develop an outer shell worth the name so it is unable to create a ‘ripple’ of much consequence around it. Also, it does not develop a well-formed core because what could have become at least an apology for a core has been mercilessly ‘deformed’ right at birth by the ‘kick’. It is fated to keep on doing its best to ‘rectify’ the ‘damage’ of that kick. But every effort at it only shifts it by a distance equal to its ‘size’. The handicap stays on even after it makes a trillion trials. Yet, it never gives up till its ‘last breath’.

Thus an electromagnetic wave is just a string of ‘premature’ pulse-lets ever trying to pulse on their own but never quite making it. Such a pulse-let has no full-formed ‘body’ at any stage of its pulsing. Therefore no direct force can be applied on it. It has been given a mighty ‘kick’ at the very start so that its only pulsing mode is ‘rectification’. So, this sort of a pulse-let does not develop a regular ripple worth anything around it in S. It does not ‘wait’ at any point long enough to ‘collect’ feed-back from the ripple of whatever import ensuing from its rectification pulsing. Therefore, one cannot easily ‘control’ it by applying a ‘field’ either. Blocking it is the only decisive thing one can do with it. If stopped, it ceases to be what it has been after ‘releasing’ the quantum that originally went into its making.

Thus a new variety now joins the list of pulses already made. This pulse-let too exhibits ‘particle’ properties during very brief moments in the course of its pulsing act. It makes a show of this in ways much less remarkable than its ‘luckier’ cousins do, but it carries out the ritual as best as it can.

To complete the picture of this kind of a pulse-let, we may look at it also from the point of view of S. S is made to ‘suffer’ a disturbance to its composure when the emission is injected into it. S tries to ‘catch’ and contain it but it ‘slips’ out every time it is almost ‘caught’. Nevertheless, S refuses to ‘admit defeat’ even after a trillion trials. The vigour of the effort by S to ‘catch’ it is the same as that with which it ‘flaps its wings’ to ‘speed’ away. Any frequency is possible because resonance with S is not involved. In short, it travels as fast as the vigour of S makes it go and S keeps ‘reaching after’ it equally fast to ‘entrap’ it, a perennial neck-and-neck chase. Its speed in any S therefore is the ultimate speed with which anything can ever move in that S. In other words, this speed is the index of the readiness with which the S in question can deal with a disturbance to its toughness – its vigour.

The T-and-D of emission determines the frequency of the resultant radiation pulse. The higher the T-and-D injected, the quicker the reaction of S and therefore higher the frequency of pulsing. But, once adequately kick-started, the speed of displacement of the radiation pulse in S remains the same because thereafter it is solely controlled by, and is a reflection of nothing but, the vigour of S.

As the T-and-D of emission increases, the transacted quantum grows capable of securing a resonance slot and gets ‘wedded’ to S. It completes its expansion cycle, resonates with S and takes the push of repulsion from the emitter pulse on its outer shell. But it is ‘thick-skinned’ enough by the time this push comes. So this gives it no more than a decent ‘send-off’ velocity plus the corresponding but bearable ‘heartburn’ of rectification pulsing.

What if the quanta attempted to be emitted is too little or too ‘thin’ to reach even the stage of ‘maturity’ of the radiation pulse? It gets ‘pushed back’ into the emitter every time by S.

The arena of forces and fields is indeed vast. There are ferocious things there side by side with extremely weak and meek specimens. They appear so very diverse and yet, as is argued in the next chapter, they are all derived from one and the same source.

 



5

Of Forces and Fields

 

 


The forces that power the universe are seemingly different. Gravitation is one. It keeps the heavenly bodies remain where they are and going the way they do. It is a simple force, the force with which bodies attract each other. It is equal to the product of the masses of the bodies attracting each other and varies inversely with the square of the distance between them.

Electric force is another. Although it seems to power human abodes more than it does the universe these days, it shoulders a major share of the responsibility of keeping the larger world around us as it is. Magnetic force, the alter ego of electric force, holds an equal share.

Yet another entity, nuclear force, has been put into two compartments for the convenience of physics, the ‘strong’ variety and the ‘weak’. But for this force, the sun would not shine, stars would hardly smile and superpowers would cease to be super.

Suffice it to say that anything anybody does or happens anywhere in the universe is the result of one or more of these forces acting severally or in various combinations.

As physics is the science of the forces of nature, physicists have been studying them better and better with the result that these have been understood and tamed more or less. It has been a long road of frustrations and revelations. Laws governing the ‘fundamental’ forces have been worked out, tested, verified, modified and refined to a rare finesse.

Unfortunately, despite all this, physics now stands practically arrested by a roadblock. The loud sign on the barricade reads: Unify the various forces and proceed.

This may look like a very simple and innocent suggestion on the face of it, but it is the toughest challenge ever thrown in front of anybody anywhere.

On one side of the roadblock are the deep valleys of quantum physics. On the other are the very high peaks of general relativity. Unifying the forces means construction of a LEVEL bridge between the two. But this has to be done without chopping off a peak or filling up a valley.

What the various forces do is well known. What is not so well known is what they actually are. It is not that physics did not try to find out. It did and continues to do. But the forces seem to silently proclaim that, though they are ready and willing to concede almost every other demand, they do not want to make a ‘public appearance’ for open scrutiny.

Physics has been trying to pair up the forces or hitch each one of them on to another and thus reduce their total number. Electricity and magnetism obliged. The two now form the Siamese twin of electromagnetism. The week-nuclear force has been laboriously hitched on to this pair, making it a trio called the electro-weak force. But gravitation remains aloof.

An approach to a solution to the problem perhaps lies in a closer look at pulses in action. Freeze the action of a ‘natural-born’ pulse at the pinnacle of its expansion cycle. Two of the ‘different’ forces become visible. (Fig.15) The one at the rim of the pulse is the strong-nuclear force with the ‘rank’ of highest might. The one ‘humbly’ present a little away from the pulse is the force of gravitation.

The two forces are now frozen in their tracks. The thick wall at the border of the pulse is the super-tough outer shell of the pulse combined with the thick shell just outside of it contributed by the extra toughness S has assumed due to displacement of it during the expansion of the pulse.

The inner half of this wall sharply falls in toughness with distance from the rim inward. The outer half of it has an equal gradient of toughness, sharply falling as one moves away from the rim of the pulse and out. The two together make a formidable wall of toughness. It is the fort of the strong-nuclear force. (Fig. 16)

Watch what happens when a similar wall approaches it. The closer the two walls get, the toughness between them shoots up. S does not ‘permit’ the development of any such thing. S ‘pulls’ the two apart. So, in the usual course, one such wall can never approach another. Any attempt at merger triggers enormous repulsion. At whichever angle or with whatever velocity another wall approaches, it is bounced. For all practical purposes, one wall of this kind is ‘untouchable’ by another. (Fig. 17)

Move the picture by a few frames and freeze it again. The reverse cycle of the pulse is halfway through. The inner half of the outer wall is ‘withdrawn’. The outer half has spread into the vacant lot thus provided.

Run the thing fast forward a little more and freeze. (Fig. 19) It is the end of the reverse cycle of the pulse. Almost the entire toughness commanded by the pulse is now concentrated at its core. The top-ranking force has reappeared and can be seen in control of its new bastion.

Meanwhile what happens outside the pulse? S has caved in further. Also, the decline in toughness thus created is spreading fast (at the rate warranted by the vigour of S) into the surroundings of the pulse. (Fig. 20)

Move the tape again by another small length. The frozen frame this time is the picture midway through the expansion cycle of the pulse. The top-ranking force is re-appearing at its earlier position at the rim.

Outside the pulse, the gradient caused by the ‘explosion’ is being refilled. But this operation is ‘half-hearted’ compared to the ‘rush inward’ during the reverse cycle. This is because S is already tough. Its readiness to spread is a lot more than its willingness to shrink.

Gravitation confidently stays where it has always remained. The reason is that around the pulse, during every ‘beat’, there is a decrease in toughness that spreads very fast followed by the slow ‘making up’ of it. The ‘jerk-in’ is repeated at every instance of pulsing action.

‘So what?’ one may ask. To find the answer, take a look at what this kind of ‘ripple’ does to another pulse coming within its sway. (Fig. 21) The sudden decline in toughness around it acts on it, tending to ‘deform’ it, just as a force acting on it does. This amounts to ‘attraction’ for the host and, if strong enough, the ‘invitation’ is acknowledged, accepted and acted upon.

Another question arises: ‘What amount of force of this kind can a small pulse exert? Fair enough. Imagine what the cumulative effect of this kind of force will be when there are a lot of pulses contributing to it in unison. The clout of this combined force can move anything of any weight. That is why gravitation can stay confident.

Isn’t there a lot more to this mystery? To see the impact of gravitation, zoom to a pulse within its sway. The ‘ripple’ that spreads affects the host pulse in several ways at once.

1) It tends to pull the host in, as already seen.

2) It tends to rotate the host in the direction of the ‘jerk-in’ spiral of the ripple. Zoom in further. (Fig.22) The effect becomes more pronounced when the affected pulse is large enough or is a large body of pulses. The arms of the spiral that reach its front are stronger than the arms that reach its back and reach thereabouts ‘later’. Hence the torque.

3) Every part of the body subjected to the ‘jerk-in’ of the ripple also experiences the tangential component of the ‘ripple’. Therefore, a free-falling body tends to circle the attracting body instead of coming straight to it. (Fig. 23)

4) When there are many bodies orbiting a massive attracting body, gravitational force between the ‘free-fallers’ tends to align them in a common plane; as that is how every one of them can get closest to every one else in the course of their orbital motions.

5) As and when pulses that are ‘sufficiently’ invited are also free to move they eventually conglomerate. If the pulses in a conglomerate are free to move within it, gravitational pull induces every pulse to place itself as close to every other of the lot. The assembly therefore assumes spherical shape.

6) The ‘ripple’ (gravitational force) takes shape on the basis of the vigour of S and spreads as fast as the vigour of S warrants. Eventually, gravitation establishes itself as a set of concentric ‘pulse-lets’ around the gravitating body. We may call them ‘g-secondary’ pulse-lets, or graviton. (Fig. 24) The ‘g-secondary’ pulses grow in might as gravitational accretion gathers momentum. Changes in the ‘gravity’ of the source are transmitted ‘across’ g-secondary pulses with a speed not more than what is dictated by the vigour of S. Therefore gravitation cannot act ‘instantaneously’ at a distance. We may get the chance to ‘feel’ the speed with which information travels ‘through’ g-secondary pulses in an event like a star suddenly going extinct. In that case, the g-secondary pulses associated with the star get ‘free’ in quick succession to ‘forget’ what they have been doing so far (in ‘captivity’), try to pulse on their own and come to whatever end awaits them. (If the sun closes shop at this moment, man may get about eight minutes to pray – but only if he has a sixth sense to know of the catastrophe ‘instantaneously’.)

7) Though the ripple ideally reaches infinite distances, in any particular case there arises a definite limit beyond which it falls short of strength to overcome the ‘inertia’ of even the smallest of pulses. It is known that the sun’s empire ends at the border of what is known as the solar system. There is an immense lot of ‘matter’ in the form of dust and icy clouds just outside but the sun’s gravitational attraction is too weak to influence pulses beyond the limit. This limit of course fluctuates with variations in the ‘asset’ value of the ‘holding company’.

8) When there is a large spherical assembly of pulses, their ‘ripples’ reinforce each other most at the centre of the sphere. If the body is large enough, the effect may reach alarming proportions. Even the top ranking force, strong-nuclear, will have to concede ground. The pulses so far fortified by it begin to get vulnerable. If the size of the conglomeration crosses a certain limit, the resultant bout of radiation shatters it. The maximum size that a conglomeration of pulses can assume without leading to such (gravitational) collapse is determined by the vigour of S in which it forms. In S of a different vigour this limit will of course be different.

9) If the conglomeration is very large, the ‘ripple’ emanating from it may grow strong enough to affect even rectification-pulses (electromagnetic radiation) passing close to it. The effect becomes more and more pronounced as the pulse gets closer to the conglomerate. If the path of the ‘ray’ is close enough and/or the conglomeration it passes adequately large, the ray takes a smooth and inward bend.

To get a view of the electro-weak force one just repeats the observation, this time on the pulse ‘suffering’ from a depletion of vigour of surrounding S. (Fig. 25) The S around the pulse is slowly decreasing in vigour. From tough, it is 'thinning' out. The pulse in this has three parts, as we noted before.

1) The primary pulse-let or positive pulse-let. (Fig. 25)

2) The secondary pulse-let or negative pulse-let. (Fig. 26)

 

Interaction between secondary pulses gives rise to the electro-weak force. Secondary pulses merit special attention as they are the ones that make building blocks (compounds) possible. (See the next chapter.)

If and when the mother pulse is ‘perturbed’ (by further changes in the vigour of surrounding S or by additional inputs into its T-and-D) it goes further ‘out of tune’ with its surroundings. As a result it ‘relinquishes’ a ‘portion’ of any or all of its parts or any combinations thereof.

If perturbed more, the mother-pulse slips farther out of the resonance slot it enjoys with surrounding S and makes ‘heavy jettisoning’. Packages that emanate as various kinds of rectification-pulses (radiation) accompany most of these ‘heavy adjustments’. Different forms of ‘decay’ and the various products of it are well known to particle chasers.

So, how many forces are there in the universe? In effect there is just one, the ‘force’ or the vigour of S. But how are crystals, chemical compounds, molecules, macromolecules and, finally, ‘life’ made with just this one?

 

 


To the concluding chapters (Chapters 6,7 and 8)
Back to Chapters 1, 2 and 3

Verses from the Bhagavad Gita outlining the ancient eastern concept of the Stuff (Brahma)

The fundamentals of Advaita philosophy, with a study of the concept of Brahma or the Stuff
To the Author's Home Page
Click here to read the
condensed version

 


Stuff and Style of the Universe
First published Nov. 2002 by Hi-Tech Books
Copyright with Hi-Tech Books, Kochi, India